取向硅钢产品表面质量检测对比分析

电工钢 ›› 2020, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4): 31-.

取向硅钢产品表面质量检测对比分析

张海利1，贾志伟1，马丹丹2，李莉1，王项龙1，杨平2

1. 鞍钢集团有限公司钢铁研究院，辽宁鞍山 114009；
2.北京科技大学材料科学与工程学院，北京 100083

出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-11-02

Comparative inspection and analysis of surface quality of grain oriented silicon steel products#br#

ZHANG Haili1,JIA Zhiwei1,MA Dandan2, LI Li1,WANG Xianglong1,YANG Ping2

1.Iron and Steel Research Institute of Ansteel Group Corporation, Anshan 114009, China；
2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 检测了3家不同企业取向硅钢成品板表征表面质量的指标，同时对表面层采用扫描电镜和能谱仪进行微观结构和化学成分组成进行检测。对比不同企业的成品板表面质量指标和微观结构发现：不同企业的取向硅钢表面层质量有差异，A产品表面绝缘电阻高于B和C产品且后者表面绝缘电阻相当，B和C产品涂层附着性和耐蚀性优于A产品。从微观形貌和成分分析上可以得出，A产品绝缘层厚是表面绝缘电阻大的原因之一，B、C产品附着性级别好是由于钉扎在基体的颗粒大或是距离硅酸镁较近，A产品表面有裂纹导致耐蚀性下降。

关键词: 取向硅钢, 绝缘层, 硅酸镁底层, 微观组织

Abstract: The surface quality indexes of grain oriented silicon steel plates/sheets from three different enterprises were tested. The microstructure and chemical composition of the surface layers were examined by scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer. Comparing the surface quality indexes and microstructures of the samples from different enterprises, it is observed that both the surface layer qualities and the surface insulation resistances of the three products are different. The surface insulation resistance of A product is higher than B and C products, with the equivalent of the surface insulation resistance of B and C products. The coating adhesion and corrosion resistance of B and C products are better than those of A product. From the analysis of morphology and composition, it can be concluded that one reason for the high surface insulation resistance of A product is the thick insulation layer, and the good adhesion level of B and C products is due to the large spinal/particles pinned on the matrix or close to magnesium forsterite, and the corrosion resistance of A product decreases due to the microcracks on the insulating layer surface.

Key words: grain oriented silicon steel, insulation layer, magnesium forsterite layer, microstructure

张海利, 贾志伟, 马丹丹, 李莉, 王项龙, 杨平. 取向硅钢产品表面质量检测对比分析[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(4): 31-.

ZHANG Haili, JIA Zhiwei, MA Dandan, LI Li, WANG Xianglong, YANG Ping. Comparative inspection and analysis of surface quality of grain oriented silicon steel products#br#[J]. Electrical Steel, 2020, 2(4): 31-.

[1]	夏雪兰, 裴英豪, 施立发, 祁旋, 陈明侠. 无铝成分低牌号无取向硅钢析出物研究[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(4): 22-.
[2]	杨平, 刘丽莹, 马丹丹, 张海利, 贾志伟, 董晨欣. 取向硅钢点状露晶的检测与分析[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(3): 1-8.
[3]	陈振文, 谢凯, 尹振芝, 刘彭. 高牌号无取向硅钢50W350炼钢生产实践[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(3): 14-17.
[4]	刘文鹏, 高振宇, 郭琪, 辛亚会, 陈春梅, 李亚东. 常化温度对高牌号无取向硅钢析出物的影响[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(3): 18-24.
[5]	陆天林, 施立发, 裴英豪, 杜军, 徐文祥. 常化处理对1.1 %Si无取向硅钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(3): 25-28.
[6]	胡志强, 张文康. 在我国申请的冷轧取向硅钢涂层专利技术分析[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(3): 48-52.
[7]	张峰, 王波, 沈侃毅. 高硫硅钢硫化物析出行为及其微观组织和电磁性能变化#br#[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 1-7.
[8]	郝允卫, 王波. 中频薄规格无取向硅钢的温度效应研究[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 8-10.
[9]	王茹玉. 热轧加热温度对3.0 %Si无取向硅钢组织及析出物的影响[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 11-16.
[10]	何志坚, 施立发, 裴英豪, 程国庆, 占云高, 刘青松. 冷轧厚度对3.0 %Si无取向硅钢组织及磁性能的影响[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 16-20.
[11]	童海斌, 李刚, 张泉, 王龙, 张培毅, 罗文俊, 朱登武. 酸连轧机高牌号无取向硅钢焊接工艺优化[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 26-30.
[12]	李毅伟, 李德君, 乔浩浩. 高冲片性50BW600电磁性能影响因素及工艺控制[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 31-34.
[13]	许彦波. 中冶新材新能源汽车用硅钢退火涂层机组装备特点[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 50-52.
[14]	（译）王杰, 潘妮. 以氮化硅为抑制剂的高磁感取向硅钢[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(2): 58-61.
[15]	马长松, 沈侃毅. 安普朗南美取向硅钢产品及工艺研究进展[J]. 电工钢, 2020, 2(1): 9-14.