小方坯带液芯重压下裂纹倾向试验研究与探讨

炼钢

小方坯带液芯重压下裂纹倾向试验研究与探讨

（1. 中冶连铸技术工程有限责任公司北京冶金技术研究院，北京 100028； 2. 北京科技大学钢铁冶金新技术国家重点实验室，北京 100083； 3. 鞍钢股份有限公司炼钢总厂，辽宁鞍山 114021）

接受日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2016-04-05

Study on crack tendency of the heavy reduction on liquid core of billet

Accepted:1900-01-01 Online:2016-04-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 连铸压下技术是一项解决铸坯内部质量的重要技术，基于180 mm×180 mm断面小方坯72A钢种大量单辊重压下（5～20 mm压下量）的结果，讨论了压下裂纹问题。结果表明：相比较于多辊轻压下，单辊重压下导致压下裂纹的可能性更小；就72A钢种，在铸坯中心固相率大于0.3以后的位置进行单辊重压下，铸坯实际变形在16 mm以内未出现裂纹。进一步分析裂纹机理可以发现：单辊重压下的变形量更多作用到了铸坯芯部；当压下在脆性区（ZST到ZDT区间）产生裂纹后，单辊重压下的裂纹向芯部发展，而多辊轻压下的裂纹更倾向于向坯壳方向发展。

关键词: 小方坯, 重压下, 轻压下, 裂纹, 机理, 偏析

Abstract: Heavy reduction is a important technology that can effectively improve the internal quality of the billets. However, effective prevention of cracks was very essential during the implementation of this mechanical reduction technology. In this study, formation mechanisms of cracks in the 72A steel ascast billets (180 mm×180 mm) with heavy reduction of 5～20 mm by a single pair of rollers were discussed. It was found that tendency of cracks was weaker during heavy reduction compared to soft reduction. With heavy reduction by 16 mm at a solid fraction of larger than 0.3by the single pair of rollers, no cracks were observed in the 72A steel billets. Based on the experimental result, formation mechanisms of cracks were proposed as following: compared to soft reduction, stress can be much more effectively transferred to the center of the billets. With the initiations of cracks during reduction, they tended to develop towards the center of the billets by single pair of rollers, nevertheless, the initiated cracks preferred to grow towards the shells of the billets during soft reduction by multi-pairs of rollers.

Key words: billet, heavy reduction, soft reduction, crack, mechanics, segregation

钱亮1，董其鹏2，李泽林3，陈志凌1，韩丽娜1. 小方坯带液芯重压下裂纹倾向试验研究与探讨[J]. 炼钢.

[1]	付雨潇1,2,朱立光2,3,孙立根1,2,周景一1,2,胡海亮1,2. 含Nb高强钢高温凝固特性与物性参数的计算[J]. 炼钢, 2020, 36(2): 34-41.
[2]	徐旺1,2，刘增勋1,2，肖鹏程1,2,朱立光2,3. 方坯表面纵裂的数值模拟研究[J]. 炼钢, 2020, 36(2): 48-52.
[3]	谢长川1, 李富帅1, 钱亮1, 邹旭1，郭春光2. 高拉速小方坯铸机关键技术的研发及应用[J]. 炼钢, 2020, 36(2): 59-62.
[4]	张利民,2，朱立光1,,田鹏1,2，肖鹏程1,2，刘增勋1,2，张彩军1,2. 65Mn钢冷轧起皮缺陷分析与控制[J]. 炼钢, 2020, 36(2): 63-69.
[5]	张洪才，林鹏，许正周，印传磊，翟万里，许光乐. Φ380 mm 40Cr钢连铸圆坯结晶器电磁搅拌器电流参数优化 [J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(6): 41-45.
[6]	周庆龙，蒋一，竺安果，江来珠. 节镍奥氏体不锈钢表面质量改善研究[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(6): 72-76.
[7]	林大帅，李晓斐，张文涛，李艳峰，王景宁，刘剑锋. 轻压下对C610L连铸板坯内部品质的改善[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(5): 50-53.
[8]	孙江波，翟晓毅，徐斌，陈晓辉. HRB400E棒材堆钢原因分析及控制措施[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(5): 54-56.
[9]	李建新,王新东,李双江. 河钢炼钢技术进步与展望[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(4): 1-7.
[10]	从俊强1，仇圣桃1，米进周2，张兴中1，杨文峰2，康健英3. 基于LMBP-MIV的板坯表面纵裂纹成因在线判定[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(4): 59-65.
[11]	苏瑞先1，陈志平2. 16MnCr5连铸板坯中心偏析的控制研究[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(3): 42-46.
[12]	刘启龙1，朱伦才2，曹成虎1，崔磊2，舒宏富2,郑晴1. 超高强汽车用钢QP980铸坯质量控制[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(2): 46-50.
[13]	操龙虎. 电炉炼钢中二噁英的排放现状及减排措施[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(1): 24-28.
[14]	康伟1，2，吕志升1，2，孙群3，王洪涛3，栗红1，2，廖相巍1，2. 连铸坯角部裂纹控制技术研究[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(1): 66-70.
[15]	王向红，张建斌，屠兴圹，张正林. 轻压下对220 mm×260 mm大方坯轴承钢内部质量的改善[J]. 炼钢, 2018, 34(6): 34-39.