炼钢 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 44-48.

• 试验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

EMS对板坯表层气泡分布的影响研究

雷少武,张炯明,董其鹏,苌真真   

  1. (北京科技大学 冶金与生态工程学院,北京 100083)
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-25 修回日期:2014-07-23 接受日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2015-04-05 发布日期:2015-04-23
  • 通讯作者: 张炯明 E-mail:jiongmingzhang@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国国家自然科学基金

Study of the effect of EMS on the bubble distribution in slab surface layer

  • Received:2014-06-25 Revised:2014-07-23 Accepted:1900-01-01 Online:2015-04-05 Published:2015-04-23

摘要: 采用金相分析法对有无电磁搅拌工艺IF钢板坯表层大于50 μm的气泡分布规律进行了统计研究。结果显示,在2种工艺下,气泡以聚集带的形式集中于距离铸坯表面一定的位置,但是在有电磁搅拌工艺时,气泡分布不存在明显的关于宽面中线的对称性。通过对结晶器内流场的模拟分析,揭示出2种工艺的差别主要在于结晶器电磁搅拌改善了水口冲击区流场的分布,有电磁搅拌时,水口冲击区具有较平稳的横向流,有利于气泡的去除,而无结晶器电磁搅拌时,结晶器宽面1/4位置存在较大的纵向旋流区,使得气泡在这一区域聚集且易被捕捉。通过试验与模拟相结合的研究手段,研究了电磁搅拌对铸坯表层气泡的影响规律,对于汽车板用坯料洁净度的控制具有重要的意义。

关键词: 铸坯, 气泡, 分布规律, 电磁搅拌

Abstract: The distribution of over 50 μm bubbles in slab surface layer with or without EMS was studied by using metallographic analysis method. The results show that the bubbles of the two processes cluster at a certain distance from the inner arc of the slab as the accumulation zone, but the bubbles distribution with EMS has no obvious symmetry about the centerline of the broad face. Numerical results from a flow analysis in the mold show that the main difference between the two processes is that EMS can improve flow distribution of the nozzle impact area. A more stable transverse flow appears the nozzle impacting area with EMS, which is helpful to the removal of the bubbles; while without EMS, there is a large longitudinal vortex area at the quarter of the broad face, which leads to the bubbles clustering and easily to be captured by the shell. The influence on the bubbles distribution with or without EMS was studied by combining the experiment with the simulation, it's important for the purity of the IF steel casting slab.

Key words: slab, bubble, distribution rule, EMS